One word: awesome.
Thanks a lot, this is a great update and makes an already very good table excellent.
What are the recommended settings in the nVidia control panel?
Can you please post your values for:
Anisotropic filtering
Antialiasing - gamma correction
Antialiasing - Mode
Antialiasing - Setting
Antialiasing - Transparency
Or a screenshot showing all 3D values would be even better...
See this thread and the first post for recommended traditional AA settings. If you're using Windows XP then try the settings and the link in one of the last posts by thewool regarding FXAA (you would still use the same anisotropic filtering settings for both):
http://www.vpforums....topic=20801&hl=Thanx Jimmy,
I appreciate your comments. I will try the settings you suggest for sure!
Is it possible however that different systems/cards play different, even with similar settings. I say this because i have always found that i have my slope needs to be set much higher than most. I almost never use the settings authors set as their default, and not because i don't think there settings are valid, but i just wonder if it plays different on my system. And this goes for FP as well... Almost every table author seems to be set at less than 8 in FP (there are exceptions), and i always need to go to 9.2- 9.4 as the slope.
VP varies....
Regardless, excellenty job. I don't want to sidetrack you with my possible system issues, but i am happy to try your suggestions while having fun in doing so
Cheers,
Maceman
Yes, it is possible but really only if you have an accelerometer or another analog joystick device connected to your computer / cab on which you are running
VP. Might also depend on the
VP build version too as to which devices would be supported / recognized.
One time after temporarily moving my mini-cab and confusingly actually bad timing wise as I was developing the BMPR system, I went back to play another (normal vs. BMPR
WIP) table and the ball looked way to fast and is if the drain was partially made out of a black hole like substance. I had to rub my eyes and thought for a moment that I had just become too adjusted to the hours of fiddling on extending the ball apex and what not with the BMPR. Luckily, I have two systems and can compare between them in certain instances (in IT as well, which is my living, the aspect of comparison is at the root of a lot of problem solving and troubleshooting and I've always valued the ability to compare when trying to figure things out). It turned out that my accellerometer needed to be re-calibrated and afterwards thiings returned to normal - it must have got out of whack either between the moving and position in my car or the temperature maybe even as it was winter time.
So, by the sounds of things I would almost hazard a guess that if you're constantly having to increase slope in both
VP and
FP that something is out of alignment on your system. You should try unchecking
PBW accellerometer in the table settings and see if things play different but definitely try on another rig.
One other thing that you could do to test and which would provide actual objective / quantitative data is to download and use my BMPR test table as it has a built in statistics gathering / measuring mechanism, and the video I posted about it has the values updating on what should result on a normal / non-misaligned table. A increase or decrease to the slope of the table via accellerometer manipulation (intentional or otherwise) would change the results and numbers. Heck, even just looking at how far above the line the ball travels in the video vs. runng the demo table on system with the BMPR enabled or disabled will give you a visual cue as to whether your system may be light on the gravity / pull down side.
You should download that demo and try it on your system as well as hopefully another spare PC you can find and see if the values for ball speeds at the various markers and drop times match. As I say, if you only have one system to work with, you may be able to just watch my video in that BMPR topic and compare as it should match on any given system with the demo table running at least excluding having an accellerometer in the mix.
Here is the link to that topic:
http://www.vpforums....topic=19388&hl=
Edited by jimmyfingers, 09 October 2012 - 06:35 AM.