- View New Content
-
Getting Started
-
Tutorials
Tutorial Categories
Tutorials Main Page Installation and Setup Downloadable TutorialsROM Adjustments
Number of Balls Adjustments Volume Adjustments
-
Visual Pinball Tables
VP 8 Desktop Tables
All VPM Recreations VP Recreations VP/VPM MODs VP Originals ROMsVP 9 Desktop Tables
All VPM Recreations VP Recreations VP/VPM MODs VP Originals ROMsVP9 Cabinet Tables
All Full Screen Cabinet Full Screen B2S Cabinet Spanned Cabinet Tables Media Packs ROMsVPX Tables
All VPinMAME Recreations VPX- - /VPinMAME - MOD Tables VPX Recreations VPX Originals Media Packs ROMs VR
-
Frontend Media & Backglass
Media Packs
Complete Media Packs Wheel Logos VideosBackglasses
dB2S Animated Backglasses UVP Animated Backglasses Topper Images
- Future Pinball Tables
-
Design Resources
Main Resources
Table Templates Playfield Images Image Library Sound Library Key CodesVP Guides
VP8 Guide - English VP8 Guide - Deutsch VP9 Guide - English VP9.1.x Guide - English VP Object Guide VPM DocumentationFuture Pinball Resources
Playfield Images 3D Model LibraryFuture Pinball Guides
FP Script Guide Big Draco Script Guide FP Table Design Guide FP DMD Guide
- Other Features
- Bug Tracker
- Image Gallery
- Blogs
-
More
Copy lights preserving names in 912?
Started By
luvthatapex
, Dec 07 2011 02:06 PM
18 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 07 December 2011 - 02:06 PM
I'm working on a table with LED segments and want to copy 240 LED lights from one of my tables.
When I do this, the lights copied get a new name, usually the old name with a 1 at the end.
I searched and found that vp 909 can copy preserving names. 912 definately does not preserve the names.
Is there an option in 912 to copy preserving names, or do we have to wait for a new build to resolve this?
I know the table I am copying TO does not have any of the lamp names so there is no reason this shouldn't work if preserve names is in 912.
Its a very handy feature to have. Maybe I am missing something....
Thanks,
LTA
When I do this, the lights copied get a new name, usually the old name with a 1 at the end.
I searched and found that vp 909 can copy preserving names. 912 definately does not preserve the names.
Is there an option in 912 to copy preserving names, or do we have to wait for a new build to resolve this?
I know the table I am copying TO does not have any of the lamp names so there is no reason this shouldn't work if preserve names is in 912.
Its a very handy feature to have. Maybe I am missing something....
Thanks,
LTA
#2
Posted 07 December 2011 - 02:37 PM
QUOTE (luvthatapex @ Dec 7 2011, 09:06 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm working on a table with LED segments and want to copy 240 LED lights from one of my tables.
When I do this, the lights copied get a new name, usually the old name with a 1 at the end.
I searched and found that vp 909 can copy preserving names. 912 definately does not preserve the names.
Is there an option in 912 to copy preserving names, or do we have to wait for a new build to resolve this?
I know the table I am copying TO does not have any of the lamp names so there is no reason this shouldn't work if preserve names is in 912.
Its a very handy feature to have. Maybe I am missing something....
Thanks,
LTA
When I do this, the lights copied get a new name, usually the old name with a 1 at the end.
I searched and found that vp 909 can copy preserving names. 912 definately does not preserve the names.
Is there an option in 912 to copy preserving names, or do we have to wait for a new build to resolve this?
I know the table I am copying TO does not have any of the lamp names so there is no reason this shouldn't work if preserve names is in 912.
Its a very handy feature to have. Maybe I am missing something....
Thanks,
LTA
I had to rename every single one on a recent conversion I did. Sucked...
Preserving names should be not just an option, but a requirement..
I am, therefore I run.
#4
Posted 07 December 2011 - 03:51 PM
You could have used an old version of VP9 to copy your objects and keep the same names, I think 9.07 does it.
VP need devs if you know someone.... Cupid and Manofwar, both seem to be missing in action.
VP need devs if you know someone.... Cupid and Manofwar, both seem to be missing in action.

You have discovered an Easter egg. Pat yourself on the back.
#5
Posted 07 December 2011 - 03:59 PM
QUOTE (Bob5453 @ Dec 7 2011, 10:51 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
You could have used an old version of VP9 to copy your objects and keep the same names, I think 9.07 does it.
VP need devs if you know someone.... Cupid and Manofwar, both seem to be missing in action.
VP need devs if you know someone.... Cupid and Manofwar, both seem to be missing in action.
Yes, that is what Dan thought as well, but we both tried it and couldn't get it to work,so i ended up renaming the bunch.....
I think if you have an older version table with the display working,and move forward to 912, it will retain the naming, but going from vp912 back to 9.09and then back didn't work for us unfortunately....
I actually asked my wife to do it for me since she is a fast typer
#8
Posted 07 December 2011 - 05:45 PM
QUOTE (luvthatapex @ Dec 7 2011, 12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ok, so I just tried the VP 909 experiment witha VP 912 table.
It works if you copy the table objects to a brand new table. It doesn't preserve filenames if you created the table in a version > 909.
BUMMER!
It works if you copy the table objects to a brand new table. It doesn't preserve filenames if you created the table in a version > 909.
BUMMER!
I just tried this in the latest development build and it appears to work correctly! I saw a previous thread regarding it's implementation in development which made me test it out. I got the build from helping a developer test a feature so am not sure how best for you to get a copy nor feel confident that I can appropriately distribute it here / provide a link. However, I believe there are channels / topics for how to acquire the latest build.
But the main thing is that it appears to work properly for the preserving names in this latest dev version and that it can be acquired.
#9
Posted 07 December 2011 - 05:51 PM
QUOTE (jimmyfingers @ Dec 7 2011, 12:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (luvthatapex @ Dec 7 2011, 12:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
ok, so I just tried the VP 909 experiment witha VP 912 table.
It works if you copy the table objects to a brand new table. It doesn't preserve filenames if you created the table in a version > 909.
BUMMER!
It works if you copy the table objects to a brand new table. It doesn't preserve filenames if you created the table in a version > 909.
BUMMER!
I just tried this in the latest development build and it appears to work correctly! I saw a previous thread regarding it's implementation in development which made me test it out. I got the build from helping a developer test a feature so am not sure how best for you to get a copy nor feel confident that I can appropriately distribute it here / provide a link. However, I believe there are channels / topics for how to acquire the latest build.
But the main thing is that it appears to work properly for the preserving names in this latest dev version and that it can be acquired.
That is GREAT news!!! Thanx JF.
#10
Posted 08 December 2011 - 12:33 AM
If I remember right I read that it will be fixed in the next release. But, I also remember that they siad when they came out with 9.12 they said any table opened with 9.12 can't be opened up with any other version afterward. If I remember right...
#11
Posted 08 December 2011 - 08:56 AM
QUOTE (Itchigo @ Dec 7 2011, 05:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If I remember right I read that it will be fixed in the next release. But, I also remember that they siad when they came out with 9.12 they said any table opened with 9.12 can't be opened up with any other version afterward. If I remember right...
Actually, that isn't quite correct. If your table you created in VP9.1.2 doesn't have any Alpha ramps in it, and the images are all BMP/JPG, then it can be opened in previous versions of VP just fine. I tested this extensively lately to be sure. Originally I didn't know, so no need to risk it, right?
Build a fire, vipers love the heat.
#12
Posted 08 December 2011 - 09:19 AM
Not a problem Destruk. I was just going from what I thought was memory. Thanks.
#13
Posted 08 December 2011 - 01:10 PM
i have build a VP912 with working copy and paste manteining names feautures using last VP source code.
I do not know if i can upload it over sendspace or similar,please destruk tell me if it is possible and if yes,i will put only exe with the last copy features.
I do not know if i can upload it over sendspace or similar,please destruk tell me if it is possible and if yes,i will put only exe with the last copy features.
#14
Posted 08 December 2011 - 05:25 PM
QUOTE (bmiki75 @ Dec 8 2011, 06:10 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
i have build a VP912 with working copy and paste manteining names feautures using last VP source code.
I do not know if i can upload it over sendspace or similar,please destruk tell me if it is possible and if yes,i will put only exe with the last copy features.
I do not know if i can upload it over sendspace or similar,please destruk tell me if it is possible and if yes,i will put only exe with the last copy features.
I think that would be ok.
Build a fire, vipers love the heat.
#15
Posted 08 December 2011 - 05:59 PM
Here the link to "vp912" with last version of "copy and paste" that mantain names beetween table.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/m3f2px
I have try it really quick, the best solution is to use this release (278) only for copy and paste.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/m3f2px
I have try it really quick, the best solution is to use this release (278) only for copy and paste.
#16
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:08 PM
What a great option. It works!
Thanks!
Thanks!
QUOTE (bmiki75 @ Dec 8 2011, 12:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Here the link to "vp912" with last version of "copy and paste" that mantain names beetween table.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/m3f2px
I have try it really quick, the best solution is to use this release (278) only for copy and paste.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/m3f2px
I have try it really quick, the best solution is to use this release (278) only for copy and paste.
#19
Posted 22 December 2011 - 04:57 PM
Is this the first entry into modeled objects for VP? What is the proposal for this new function and can we use it?
I'd love to see VP development continue.
I'd love to see VP development continue.
QUOTE (kiwi @ Dec 9 2011, 09:26 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thanks Bmiki75.
Copy and paste is OK.
I like the new primitive objects.See the picture below.
The problem is the performance, these primitive objects require much CPU

Max
Copy and paste is OK.
I like the new primitive objects.See the picture below.
The problem is the performance, these primitive objects require much CPU

Max



Top









.png)
















are all trademarks of VPFORUMS.