chas here is what's happening
1. first you enlarge length of the flippers from 116 to 135, this a big difference
2. then you spread flippers apart - so that drain in the middle is same as it was before (or close)
3. then you move flipper rails to be on top of flippers and to make even width passages for inner and outer lanes
this is when problem comes - since you enlarged flippers, made drain same size - moved flippers to the edges - of course you have much less space for lanes - and of course they are now too narrow and of course the ball will stuck
and here is explanation why chas is doing this, check this picture of edited table (only flippers) and check original screenshot of this table, compare them:
must save post now to get link to my attachment so i can insert it in post, will come back in a sec...
okidoki, can't insert images side by side, but you see old table in the post and edited table in the attachment, so compare them

what do you see?
what's the difference?
difference is - new flippers are longer, so older flippers were shorter, but why did they looked squeezed to chas - cause we all know they were not really squeezed
they looked squeezed because they were very high!!! and so instead of reducing height - chas decides to enlarge length leaving height the same
what is bothering chas is standard old fashion view of the flippers which i call up your nose view when flippers are too high so they just don't look real
chas there are 2 better solutions for that:
1. prefered one if table is angle independent - change table to layback view - 0 30 80 is good starting point (for inclination fov and layback), of course you have to set xy scale and offset also
2. if table is not angle independent - change flippers and rubbers height - not length - with few new numbers flippers will look great even on non layback tables!!! - good values are 10 16 30 (rubber offset, rubber width and flipper height)
Attached Files
Edited by blur, 03 April 2012 - 06:50 AM.





Top



















are all trademarks of VPFORUMS.