2969 replies to this topic

[fel]

I had a nice game for my standards on the flintstones table

score: 1,581,795,230
top bowler: 219

Vp version 9.1.2
Table author and version: jpsalas V. 1.02





goodbye everybody

[niliang]

the score grows up

elvira jpsalas 1.1 vp 9.12

DMD NAME : DAV

SCORE: 32,579,430

over 22 milion with the 1st ball (without consider extraball)!

Edited by niliang, 14 June 2011 - 11:59 AM.

[GSGregg]

From the forgotten world of VP8:

No stutter or other issues, and I could afford to hit whatever---except for the bumpers! (Forget the skillshot unless you love to gamble; at one point, before I wised up (not during this game, of course), they kicked the ball directly to the left outlane ten consecutive times.)
 Jkbt_GMP.JPG   145.56KB   10 downloads
Jack*Bot VP8 (BubbleHEAD)
v.2.4
19,867,367,430
Initials: GMP

[fel]

Another improvement in my flintstones score.

score: 1,768,629,620

Vp Version: 9.1.2

Table author and version: Jpsalas V. 1.02

[ced]

TOTAN by jpsalas , VP9.1x ,v3.12FS
Initials: CED
Score: 128.871.220

Good one CED! Did you beat the Genie?
Slam23

Thanks slam23 !!

It was the first time when I fought against the genius(engineering).
I had him(it) twice but impossible to beat him(it), it looks like it is necessary to go fast to beat him(it)...
Need of a little more training

[ced]

Elvira ATPM by jpsalas VP9.1x , v1.1 FS
Initials: CED
Score: 22.760.620

I have played this pin a lot when i was teenager in the 90'
Elvira ATPM by jpsalas VP9.12 , v1.1
Initials: DAV
Score: 28,930,320

Good niliang score!

In the 90s I is to play that some tables (amazing spiderman, jokerz! ,Whirlwind ,amazon hunt and world cup soccer 94) but I liked that!!!
Since I discovered visual pinball I have almost stop to play the video games...

@+

[niliang]

another high score...and every game i have only max 2 good ball....i think the day i take a perfect game i can reach 100 milion!

elvira jpsalas 1.1
vp9.12
dmd DAV
SCORE: 35,477,140

[ta2686]

another high score...and every game i have only max 2 good ball....i think the day i take a perfect game i can reach 100 milion!

elvira jpsalas 1.1
vp9.12
dmd DAV
SCORE: 35,477,140

Nice score niliang!

However, be careful. I think you'll roll this table over if you reach your 100 million goal.

Edited by ta2686, 14 June 2011 - 12:55 PM.

[ced]

STTNG by jpsalas VP9,1x ,v1.0.1 FS
Initials: CED
Score: 39.691.387.970
 sttng_s7.png   670bytes   12 downloads

[ced]

Star Wars by jpsalas VP9 v1.0 FS
Initials: CED
Score: 395.286.010
 stwr_a14.png   950bytes   6 downloads

Flintstones,The by jpsalas VP91x , v1.02 FS
Initials: CED
Score: 1.708.386.120
 fs_lx5.png   864bytes   6 downloads

[Decidetto]

Wow, nice scores on the Elvira table! The bar is being set still higher!

But anyhow:

A challenger appears!!

Score: 33,164,310

I could've done much better, as I completely messed up two multiballs, but hey!

[niliang]

Wow, nice scores on the Elvira table! The bar is being set still higher!

But anyhow:

A challenger appears!!

Score: 33,164,310

I could've done much better, as I completely messed up two multiballs, but hey!

for a little bit! 2 last ball go directly out!

Score 33,171,040
mdm : DAW (i made a mistake for the stress, i wanted DAV)

[Decidetto]

Well, "D'AW" would be something for me to say then!
I think I'll try to break that score of yours tomorrow!

[DedRok_V]

monster bash
uncle willy
vp9 v1.1 FS
792,678,450 >EDY<


r&t roadshow
jpsalas
vp91x v 1.0
1,659,344,060 >EDY<

Edited by DedRok_V, 15 June 2011 - 05:50 PM.

[DedRok_V]

Finally starting to get somewhere on this one

medievel madness
jpsalas
vp91x v 2.31
146,336,940 >EDY<

[fel]

Finally starting to get somewhere on this one

medievel madness
jpsalas
vp91x v 2.31
146,336,940 >EDY<

Keep trying dedrock is not so difficult to score high in this game when you understand how to do it

[Centaur Machine]

JP Salas' Attack from Mars.

17,913,376,130 on ball 3. (and didn't really do any good after that).

If I recall, I got 1 or 2 free games plus I got the match, or something.


... I'm not actually sure if this is that good of a score.

[fel]

JP Salas' Attack from Mars.

17,913,376,130 on ball 3. (and didn't really do any good after that).

If I recall, I got 1 or 2 free games plus I got the match, or something.


... I'm not actually sure if this is that good of a score.

Well, in my opinion you could consider this guideline:

> 30% of the highest score published is a good score
> 60% is a very good score
> 90% is an excellent score:

So, considering jpsalas attack from Mars the highest score published is 185,565,571,330. Good score would be at least 55.6 billion.. Anyway this is only my personal opinion..

Best wishes

[jimbod8]

Well, in my opinion you could consider this guideline:

> 30% of the highest score published is a good score
> 60% is a very good score
> 90% is an excellent score:

So, considering jpsalas attack from Mars the highest score published is 185,565,571,330. Good score would be at least 55.6 billion.. Anyway this is only my personal opinion..

Best wishes

So what if one person is light years better at a game compared to everyone else? Take Jackbot, for instance - on JP's table you have one person who posted a score of 45 billion and everyone else on the list is around 5-15 billion. Does that mean that they all suck (or just barely qualify as "good") simply because one person had a freakishly high score? Personally, if I was doing your percentage scale I'd be inclined to toss out first place in that scenario and just compare my score against the rest of the leaderboard. But likewise, that's my personal opinion...

[ced]

Well, in my opinion you could consider this guideline:

> 30% of the highest score published is a good score
> 60% is a very good score
> 90% is an excellent score:

So, considering jpsalas attack from Mars the highest score published is 185,565,571,330. Good score would be at least 55.6 billion.. Anyway this is only my personal opinion..

Best wishes

So what if one person is light years better at a game compared to everyone else? Take Jackbot, for instance - on JP's table you have one person who posted a score of 45 billion and everyone else on the list is around 5-15 billion. Does that mean that they all suck (or just barely qualify as "good") simply because one person had a freakishly high score? Personally, if I was doing your percentage scale I'd be inclined to toss out first place in that scenario and just compare my score against the rest of the leaderboard. But likewise, that's my personal opinion...

You are right, it depends of the high-score