Posted 06 July 2011 - 07:55 PM
Wow. I'm sort of shocked by this, and just assume the "nobigdeal" argument is coming from someone who doesn't make a living producing copywritten things. I do (I'm a writer). I write stuff for free, I write stuff for pay. I get to choose that. When I write for free and post it on a website, I'm doing that expecting the terms of my posting it to be obeyed. Those terms include things (often) like "this forum won't package up what you write and then sell it in a book." If they do, do I "lose money?" no. I but I lose control, and that's really what this is about.
Someone who writes a piece of software is no different. That they choose to give it away for some period of time is a choice. You, as the consumer, agree to the conditions of that choice because that software comes with a license, just like the music you buy from iTunes or on a CD comes with a license.
There is no requirement of "harm" to break a law. I don't "harm" anyone immediately if I run a red light on an empty street. But I have still broken the contract I agreed to when I got my license.
That's the core issue here. You can't redistribute copywritten works. This has nothing to do with money changing hands. If you don't like the terms of a particular license agreement, you are of course free not to use that software. But you don't get to just distribute it at will.
I'll give you another example. I compose a piece of music. I make it available for anyone who comes to my website and agrees to my simple terms of use: This is for your personal use! Enjoy! Don't redistribute it, but if you like it, send someone to my site to get their own copy!"
I've done this because I want traffic, right? I want people to think I make cool stuff, and when they come get their free thing, maybe someone will make me a rockstar.
There's no way you have the right to now package that song up and stick it on a CD with a bunch of other "free" music and just start handing those CDs out on the street. Because when you downloaded it, you agreed to the terms of it. By just blasting it around, I'm losing a relationship with my potential customer.
By "making" a cabinet buyer come to this site (or some other site) to download a table, or some software, the authors are assured of having a touchpoint with the end user -- a touchpoint which can include displaying terms of use, maybe getting an email, or just being a known source for help so they have a good experience.
Seems so utterly simple to me.