I think you will find, reading it back, that the only person getting put down in any way, was actually me. I didn't direct anything at anyone, and I certainly didn't call anyone a douche or said anything abusive to anyone. I also don't think I showed a blatant disregard for other's opinions - because opinions don't actually have anything to do with the law in the first place, and I don't need to be a lawyer to know that.
The whole thing just reminded me of what some
FP users say about them not using ROMs because of copyright even though they are happy to use artwork etc. For me it's an interesting debate and has nothing whatever to do with being disrespectful or insulting.
I'm certainly not on a high horse about copyright - I'm happy to admit I'm down in the mud with the rest of the plebs - I break copyright all the time - a few ROMs here, a few MP3s there, a few movies. Some I pay for when I can afford it, some I don't. I am pretty sure we all do - who seriously is entitled to play all those ROMs? As the saying goes, "let he who is without sin..."
All I'm saying is that if you want to take the moral high ground, and play the copyright card with one hand, or accuse me of trying to get something for nothing, you can't expect to be taken seriously if you are playing a table with copyrighted artwork or ROMs with the other - it doesn't stack up.
The fact that we are all doing this seems to me like a very inconvenient truth - we are all using copyrighted material without permission in some form or other, and we should be adult enough 'fess up and to debate that without insulting each other with namecalling, just because it's something you don't want to hear. At the end of the day, for 99% of people, copyright is, in the end, about what your conscience allows you to get away with.
Edited by highrise, 21 December 2010 - 11:05 PM.