3889 replies to this topic

[32assassin]

Hauntfreaks,  clear your PM inbox.  I tried to send you a message.

 

 

The member hauntfreaks cannot receive any new messages

[hauntfreaks]

Hauntfreaks,  clear your PM inbox.  I tried to send you a message.

 

 

The member hauntfreaks cannot receive any new messages

 

just made some room.... I need me some VIP status just for more PM storage  

[BorgDog]

So what's the deal with the new targets just spinning when hit?  Just computer too slow (only happens on my work computer for me)?  Is it the same with the star rollovers getting stuck down?

 

I'll vote for you to be VIP haunt   (course I have no idea where that comes from)

[hauntfreaks]

thanks...lol

I also had the spinning targets... but if I saved the table... closed the editor....and reopened it... it was fine ever since (it was my evel table)

[BorgDog]

Yup, done that, just keeps happening on this computer.  Need to figure out how to justify a better video card at work, can't play on here

 

@toxie, @fuzzel  I'm liking all the new options with targets and gates and stuff, but have a question.. Gates, can't be collidable and have a close angle other than 0?  If I make it non-collidable it is still one way, but there is no animation.  If close angle is 0 (collidable and animates) then nothing lines up right unless I want to stick primitives for everything and code them to move for all the parts (which I can do, but if we can make this work in vp then better).  

 

I'm trying to do this gate, which is obviously not at 0 degrees and if it were then balls would get stuck there.

 

[fuzzel]

thanks...lol

I also had the spinning targets... but if I saved the table... closed the editor....and reopened it... it was fine ever since (it was my evel table)

I think the spinning targets issue comes from another bug. Can someone send me a table that shows that?

[BorgDog]

 

thanks...lol

I also had the spinning targets... but if I saved the table... closed the editor....and reopened it... it was fine ever since (it was my evel table)

I think the spinning targets issue comes from another bug. Can someone send me a table that shows that?

 

PM sent

[fuzzel]

rev2411 is up:

 

- fix spinning hit targets
- limit contribution for tiny scaled DMDs
 

[jpsalas]

rev2411 is up:

 

- fix spinning hit targets
- limit contribution for tiny scaled DMDs
 

 

Thanks fuzzel The targets work now on my work computer, which also is quite slow.

[vampirolatino2]

The first time I saw the spining targets where in Evil K table, I was like .... woah, that is a cool bug lol, but it was a few revisions back. Need to test again with new revision.

[fuzzel]

That bug was there since the first revision which sorted the new targets. The animation limits to which a target should rotate was wrong.If you have a fast system the check was fast enough to stop the animation as intended but on slow systems the animation offset was over the limit and the check didn't work anymore and you got the spinning targets

[zany]

Hauntfreaks and Toxie...sure...i'll share some LUT's....i will just play around abit more with it first!

[zany]

Here's a quick test.....the right has less saturation and abit darker LUT setting.

Attached Files

•  mm_lut_test1.jpg   253.95KB   35 downloads

Edited by zany, 24 November 2015 - 04:23 PM.

[fuzzel]

Hmm but thee right one looks a Bit Dusty

[BorgDog]

 

@toxie, @fuzzel  I'm liking all the new options with targets and gates and stuff, but have a question.. Gates, can't be collidable and have a close angle other than 0?  If I make it non-collidable it is still one way, but there is no animation.  If close angle is 0 (collidable and animates) then nothing lines up right unless I want to stick primitives for everything and code them to move for all the parts (which I can do, but if we can make this work in vp then better).  

 

I'm trying to do this gate, which is obviously not at 0 degrees and if it were then balls would get stuck there.

 

 

Any thoughts on close angle other than 0 on collidable gates guys?  or is it just not going to happen?

[zany]

Hmm but thee right one looks a Bit Dusty

Well..it is more like the real thing....ok, i may lower the values some, and increase the sharpness abit.
To bad it affects the lightning aswell....but that is how it is.
I'll play around abit more..it is a nice feature!

[freneticamnesic]

I think I got a good set of color grades I'll share later. For the GI on color grade, I decrease the saturation a bit (it was looking a little cartoonish with the vibrant colors) and I really like the way it looks. For the off color grade I went with darker shadows and brighter highlights on the same color grade image as the GI on color grade. This is all with some pretty extreme table lighting settings and my standard GI lights. And naturally I like my tables dark, so it may look different on some of the brighter tables.

[zany]

Awesome Fren.....and yes....these LUT files are really something to share!

[freneticamnesic]

default colorgrade, gi off

 

modified colorgrade, gi off

 

default colorgrade, gi on

 

custom colorgrade, gi on

 

here's the custom off colorgrade

 

and the custom on colorgrade

It's weird, with the same default colorgrade, the off gi looks under saturated and the on gi looks oversaturated

[robertms]

Fren that last screenshot custom color grade gi on looks fantastic.