Jump to content




Photo
- - - - -

Star Trek TNG 20th Anniversary edition on Youtube? Where?


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#21 bazza1

bazza1

    Hobbyist

  • Silver Supporter
  • 21 posts

  • Flag: United Kingdom

  • Favorite Pinball: Pinbot

Posted 25 February 2013 - 07:20 PM

Don't know if this'll help anyone... (i may be all alone here lol) but i've kinda sorted the performance issue out.

 

When the table is running, go to task manager and select processes. Then right click on each future pinball event and change the priority to high. Then also change the 'Affinity' to both CPU's.. mine was set to only use one on one of the events.

 

hope this helps



#22 JonBaker

JonBaker

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 326 posts
  • Location:Where time has no meaning

  • Flag: Scotland

  • Favorite Pinball: Hong Kong Phooey - Doesn't exist but it should

Posted 25 February 2013 - 07:48 PM

I only play FP in desktop mode so I really wouldn't know how much of an impact running 2 screens would be on your GPU.  Most cabbers use only a single card for FP and VP so that can't be the issue.

 

Strange that turning off reflections fixed the blocking issue.  Never heard that one before.

 

Other things that can interfere with FPs performance:

 

- It does run best on XP, running on Win 7 64bit can have varied results.

- FP is sensitive to background running programes so close everything to free up every last ounce of RAM and CPU power.

 

For most users, it's trail and error finding the performance sweet spot for FP.  We all have different systems and so we all have to adjust our settings accordingly.

 

FP is not a demanding game to run.  It's fairly well optimized to run on most systems and most graphics cards.  As long as you have a decent CPU (or 2), a reasonable GPU and plentiful RAM (you can never have enough RAM!) then you should be good to go.

 

Another consideration are the tables themselves.  Each author creates their table in their own way, there is no set guide, so textures will vary in size and compression.  This can lead to performance issues but can be fixed by re-sizing the textures yourself....or hoping the original author will create a 'lite' version of the table.



#23 bazza1

bazza1

    Hobbyist

  • Silver Supporter
  • 21 posts

  • Flag: United Kingdom

  • Favorite Pinball: Pinbot

Posted 25 February 2013 - 10:25 PM

But i have 4GB ram yet when a table is running in FP and i check system resources there's only 1.8gb in use... a waste of 2gb i think (and i only just bought it)

 

My windows 7 is 32-bit.. would i really see much difference between this and XP Pro? It's a big switch if i have to do this.. may just invest in a SSD (rather than my old Sata1)



#24 JonBaker

JonBaker

    Enthusiast

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 326 posts
  • Location:Where time has no meaning

  • Flag: Scotland

  • Favorite Pinball: Hong Kong Phooey - Doesn't exist but it should

Posted 26 February 2013 - 12:58 AM

FP doesn't use too much RAM, not when compared to modern games.  If you're just using your PC to run FP and VP then 2GB  is all you need. 

 

FP was designed for XP way back in 2006 so performance-wise it's better suited for XP.  I have a duel boot system so I dip into Win 7 (64bit) from time to time but for gaming, I prefer XP for best performance.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users